elegation’s posterous

el·e·ga·tion: being highly effective, yet simple  
Filed under

healthcare

 

2010 Proposed Medicare Changes

Very Interesting.

Culled from the latest 1100+ page document on (pages 716 & 717).

As you can see, the CY 2010 Changes pay less for Cardiology (-11%), Interventional Radiology (-10%), Nuclear Medicine (-13%), Radiation Oncology (-19%), Radiology (-11%).

Specialties with the highest increase in funding include Ophthalmology (11%), Family Practice (8%), Geriatrics (8%), Physical Medicine (7%), Internal Medicine (6%), Anesthesiology (6%), Interventional Pain Management (6%).

Personally I'm a bit confused as to why ophthalmology got such a huge bump, as did anesthesia, interventional pain management, and even orthopedic surgery all enjoy an increase in reimbursement.  Meanwhile cardiology, radiology, and related radiologic service get pretty deep cuts.  

Meanwhile GI, dermatology, emergency medicine, hold steady.

Looking at the graph, its easy to tell that it truly is a zero sum game.  The combined impact nets 0-1% overall changes in funding, meaning that cuts in one area of medicine could be linked to increases in others.

Filed under  //   2010   charges   funding   healthcare   medicaid   medicare   Medicine   politics  

Comments [0]

IT Healthcare Design Zeitgeist

I'm starting to feel a convergence of ideas regarding Health IT Design.


Sean Khozin cogently states  what has been on my mind lately.

"I think practical health IT should be Intelligent, Integrated, and Interoperable. Intelligently designed systems prioritize  the needs of patients and providers. An electronic platform with well-integrated features ensures a consistent and smooth operator experience. Interoperability stands as a prerequisite to deriving real societal value from health IT and facilitates health information exchange among networks of patients and providers."

Photo taken by in Pennsylvania a tunnel.

Filed under  //   convergence   design   healthcare   hello health   informatics   IT   khozin   tunnel  

Comments [0]