elegation’s posterous

el·e·ga·tion: being highly effective, yet simple  
Filed under

medicare

 

CMS Proposed 2010 Payment for Procedures

 

Again, from the federal registrar, table 40, page 720:

While the previous table tries to demonstrate stability in fees, this table shows that charges for the same procedure and care delivery net a 10-30% decrease in charges for 2010.

Does this mean that physicians will receive a 20-30% pay decrease?

Likely not, as the Wall Street Journal reports.

The issue goes back to a law passed in the 1990s that was supposed to ensure that the amount Medicare paid doctors for each beneficiary grew no faster than the overall economy. That didn’t happen. (The law created something known as the “sustainable growth rate,” or SGR, in Washington jargon).

So now there are two different worlds. There’s the official world, in which doctors are scheduled to get a 21.5% pay cut from Medicare next year under SGR. And then there’s the real world, where Congress will intervene at the last minute to block the pay cut, as it’s done time and again in recent years.

There have been calls for Congress to fix the situation, but doing so would wreak budgetary havoc: It would require admitting that payments to physicians are way higher than the government officially expected.

Filed under  //   cms   decrease   medicare   Medicine   payment   procedures  

Comments [1]

2010 Proposed Medicare Changes

Very Interesting.

Culled from the latest 1100+ page document on (pages 716 & 717).

As you can see, the CY 2010 Changes pay less for Cardiology (-11%), Interventional Radiology (-10%), Nuclear Medicine (-13%), Radiation Oncology (-19%), Radiology (-11%).

Specialties with the highest increase in funding include Ophthalmology (11%), Family Practice (8%), Geriatrics (8%), Physical Medicine (7%), Internal Medicine (6%), Anesthesiology (6%), Interventional Pain Management (6%).

Personally I'm a bit confused as to why ophthalmology got such a huge bump, as did anesthesia, interventional pain management, and even orthopedic surgery all enjoy an increase in reimbursement.  Meanwhile cardiology, radiology, and related radiologic service get pretty deep cuts.  

Meanwhile GI, dermatology, emergency medicine, hold steady.

Looking at the graph, its easy to tell that it truly is a zero sum game.  The combined impact nets 0-1% overall changes in funding, meaning that cuts in one area of medicine could be linked to increases in others.

Filed under  //   2010   charges   funding   healthcare   medicaid   medicare   Medicine   politics  

Comments [0]